Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Print this Page [76-100] of 8458Posts from E Archer, NYCE Archer, NYC Previous 25 Next 25 Reply E Archer, NYC Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown (3/25/25) Fred, you have an amazing talent for saying absolutely nothing. Your comment is incomprehensible... Reply E Archer, NYC Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown (3/25/25) Everywhere socialism has been 'given a try' has resulted in the culling of millions of people and the subjugation of the rest — that's why socialists usually say 'true socialism hasn't been tried before.' In fact it has been tried over and over, and it has failed in its promises every time. Give Liberty a try! Reply E Archer, NYC Chris, Paradise,cal (3/25/25) Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. Policeman MUST enforce the edicts of the state. Just look at what is happening in Europe these days — people are arrested for expressing their political views and for running for elected office in opposition to the ruling party. Fascists need police to keep the public in line, it's the only way to retain power. Reply E Archer, NYC Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown (3/25/25) Are you delusional? World government is the goal of the greatest power-seekers of all. It would be nothing short of servitude for every nation. SELF-government, starting with the individual, would be the best government, if indeed people would be respectful of each other's rights. Indeed, it would take the highest order of humans, so I am not sure if it will ever be possible on a global scale. Better if each nation could secure the rights of its citizens. The UN and its globalist institutions (World Bank, WHO, ICC, IMF to name a few) are already trying to supersede the rights and powers of the nations that have become its members. No nation that issued their own currency backed by gold could join initially — they were called 'neutral' countries. One by one they have fallen to the central banks. World government would be fascistic at best and communistic at worse — it would be the government of a world central bank. Remember that the stated goal of globalists is to reduce the world's population to 500 million people — and you can bet you ain't one of them. 1 Reply E Archer, NYC 3/24/25 re: George Washington quote Same as it ever was, apparently ... Vigilance has always been key — watch the watchers! 1 Reply E Archer, NYC 3/24/25 re: Earl Warren quote I wish; however, it seems more prefer the illusion of security to the animating contest of freedom. 1 Reply E Archer, NYC Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown (3/24/25) "Liberty is Slavery", eh, Fred? Reply E Archer, NYC 3/14/25 re: Thomas Jefferson quote A lot of folks exposing the truth are literally risking their lives — it's a good chance they are over the target. Reply E Archer, NYC 3/14/25 re: James Baldwin quote The real question is what will you do once you see the ugly side... 1 Reply E Archer, NYC 3/14/25 re: Giuseppe Mazzini quote I think Mazzini is saying that while 'materialists' define liberty as the right to do or not do anything that is not directly injurious to others, he understands liberty as the faculty of choosing according to conscience. Makes sense to me. Reply E Archer, NYC Robert Edwards, Sarasota (3/11/25) Hey, RBE! Long time no hear! I'm inclined to agree, although the intent of the Founders was independence and staying out of 'entanglements' with foreign wars. I think you can blame the deep state and the central banks that foment war for fun and profit. The CIA has been up to no good since its inception and is in bed with organized crime to accomplish their goals. But I refuse to accept that America is hopelessly lost to these scoundrels. The truth crushed to earth will rise again. Reply E Archer, NYC 3/7/25 re: H. L. Mencken quote I get it, but unfortunately, those that do not believe in liberty and in fact do not believe in MY liberty are enemies of liberty. We will have to deal with them eventually... Reply E Archer, NYC 3/7/25 re: Charles Sumner quote I suppose it means that liberty is central to all, and that equal rights cannot be ever taken away — like an emperor's decree, it is 'law.' Reply E Archer, NYC 3/7/25 re: John Locke quote America used to be a nation in which the common man could own land free and clear from any claim by government to tax it or confiscate it; it made the USA unique in nearly all the world. Land patents were issued granting title in allodium — like what the King would give his generals that conquered foreign lands. Land patents are no longer paid any attention to since the introduction of fiat currency because we do not actually pay for anything with it, merely transfer the obligation of the note to another. But there are those that still have their land patents, and they know who they are. Their land cannot be taxed. Look it up. The Bureau of Land Management used to issue land patents and update them when property ownership was transferred. Now we have duplicated the British system yet again, in which the people are serfs on their own land — don't pay the tax, and the government can seize your property. Why? Because you don't have the land patent. Who does? Good question, but every square inch of land in the USA was patented when each state joined the Union. Somebody has the land patent, and the US government was prohibited from owning the land, only individual persons could own land, AND it was what made them 'electors' and the only ones whose votes were to be counted for Governor or President. 2 Reply E Archer, NYC 3/7/25 re: Justice Hugo L. Black quote Remember, the Bill of Rights does not confer rights to the People — the People already have their rights which cannot be taken away. The Bill of Rights spells out explicitly what the government may NOT do. We have no First Amendment "right" — we have a First Amendment "prohibition" of government's power to regulate speech in any way. 1 Reply E Archer, NYC Mike, Norwalk (2/28/25) I've always appreciated Mike's distinction between 'law' and 'rules' or statutes (i.e. colorable law). The laws of nature in fact cannot be 'broken' without inevitable consequences. We abide by rules or a code of conduct to avoid the inevitable 'punishment' of breaking the laws of nature. That is why Liberty is to be defended and its limits defined by the rights of all — we are not free to do anything without consequence. A republican form of government formed on the basis of the inalienable rights of humankind is the best and highest form of government — and also requires an honorable citizenry with mutual respect for all. It is no accident that the teachings of Christ form the basis of American common law — as you sow so shall you reap. Reply E Archer, NYC 2/28/25 re: Thomas Paine quote You have to remember the times and context of the quote. Paine was a significant 'influencer' in the days preceding the war for independence. Is he not wishing independence for all, not just the American colonies? Had he not seen the hypocritical wars between different religious factions? Sounds to me like a cry for freedom of religion years before the Bill of Rights protected it. I have no problem with the quote, and it has nothing to do with statist/socialist government. It's about 'independence' and the desire to 'do good' not to make others do good. Reply E Archer, NYC 2/28/25 re: Hiram Mann quote J6 prisoners come to mind. Can you imagine if Trump had not won? They would still be in there and under horrendous conditions. Classic communist/fascist/socialist tactics — imprison the dissenters. I sure would like to see some politicos put behind bars for their deceitful actions over the last 10 years. Biden issued pre-emptive pardons on some of the worst offenders — is that even lawful? If you don't hang a few treasonous politicians from time to time, they will never stop. Reply E Archer, NYC E Archer, NYC (2/24/25) As watchman has improved his communications here over the years, I would like to say I am in agreement. But keep it short and sweet if possible if you want anyone to read it, much less understand it. 2 Reply E Archer, NYC 2/24/25 re: St. Paul quote I fear this quote merely scratches the surface of the "wickedness" of those in positions of power today. The Weiner laptop "insurance policy" comes to mind. Will the whole truth be exposed once the FBI, CIA, NSA and other 'intelligence' agencies are cleared out? And that's just the US — the globalists seem to be hell-bent on killing off 3/4 of the planet while enslaving the rest. I wish I was exaggerating, but all you have to do is a bit of digging into some very creepy and dark places and you may become convinced, as I am, that Satanists literally rule the world. God help us. Reply E Archer, NYC wirkman, Ecotopia (2/23/25) Exactly, wirkman! 1 Reply E Archer, NYC Waffler, Smith (2/23/25) Good grief, Waffler demonstrates the statist programming perfectly as usual. The US government has nearly completely abandoned republican government calling its current form of statism 'democracy.' Left and right are merely on the scale of statism — a republican form of government is not even on the scale. Both communists and fascists call themselves socialists — FACT. Just ask Stalin and Hitler, both self-proclaimed socialists — and socialism eventually results in dictatorship whether from the left or the right. Too few Americans really know upon what their government is founded, and until we wake up and realize the deception, we will continue to be ruled by a de facto state that lays claim to everything and everyone. Is it time? 1 Reply E Archer, NYC 2/23/25 re: Frederic Bastiat quote I like Mike's distinction between 'law' and 'rules.' Law is immutable, rules are meant to keep behavior in line with the immutable law, to protect us from the inevitable consequences of 'breaking' the law.The Golden 'Rule' is: do unto others as you would have done unto you. Why? Because of the 'Law': As you sow, so shall you reap. Thus the need for redemption, because if we are to reap what we have sown, who can escape retribution? And so, according to the Law, we are forgiven as we ourselves forgive others. This is what Christianity in its purest sense implores upon us. Reply E Archer, NYC 2/17/25 re: Raymond Ruye quote Perhaps it has lost something in translation ... 1 Reply E Archer, NYC 2/13/25 re: John P. Reid quote Government restraint is long gone, if it ever was.... but I must say, now in 2025, I've never in all my days seen such a concerted effort to reign in the government by our elected leaders. Of course the good ol' boys and girls are screaming bloody murder — "It's a Constitutional Crisis, we are losing our democracy!" Ha! 'Their' democracy is simply their power — good riddance. Our Constitutional Republic has never been in better hands! (and it's only been 3 weeks!) Previous 25 Next 25 SaveOk2 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print