No specifics as is frequent with many of the "contributors," don't have the foggiest notion of what he is referring, and I'm very sorry to have this seemingly negative, but honest attitude. 

Let us reward the individual who built the prevailing principles of our community.

The eventual fulfillment of the promises will in time prove the responsibility, reasonableness, reliability, and the resilience of the human drive and it's simply audacious character.

Mr Archer, circumstances change; terms, conditions, realities reveal themselves more profoundly in the ever changing dynamic of the life dimension. We must evolve with it and make terms of beauty, love, friendship, as well as terms like Socialism denote sincere conatations. We must change.

If you, Mr Archer, recognize these qualities as the characteristics of the servant with their valued services rendered to the welfare of humankind, here, here to the record, and I stand by that record.  It is better to serve in heaven, than to rule in hell. 

The civilized do not loot, ransack, vandalize, or violate.  The socially responsible express the step by step transition from degeneration to rejuvenation.  All will be informed and made aware of the best possible path followed for the best interests of all participants.  A win-win circumstantial condition can be reached.  The attainable universal agreement is always felt possible to the reasonable creative individual. 

The Chairman did not appear to apparently have a well pronounced profound dream for guidance.

Gangsters change labels for a more confusing condition, never change conditions. Olds reasonably, presumably, could be associated with the old worn out childish traditions.  The irony of the children is they represent the old misrepresentation ways, the adult represents the new authenticity. 

The socially responsible has at the present to pass on decency, dignity, civility, maturity, authenticity, and morals to the young. 

The socially responsible serve in any capacity that improves humankind, kindness and charity are certainly not ruled out.

There's nothing revolutionary about war, murder, and violence. Explanations, dreams, and elequence is revolutionary.

In addition: A few of life's rules from a run-of-the-mill adult.
1. Don't do sex, we don't need it, besides girls, other animals and homosexuals bite pieces of you off. 
2. Don't do war, its murder. 
3. Don't play the game, it's for losers.

You behave yourself Mike, and don't take a long Norwalk off a short pier.

The spirit of revolution is the idea you stop acting like a out of control juvenile delinquent, and perform as a mature adult. That's where this quote contributor is registering his confusion.

There's no logical connection between war and revolution.  Every mentally ill individual out there believes they are on a violent revolutionary crusade.  We must have a reasonable explanation that can describe the best path for the preservation of the life dimension.  Peace and goodwill is the revolutionary direction. Peace and goodwill is the different and original innovation. A logical explanation is revolutionary.

The community maintains itself by respecting, adhering, and performing to its ability to change.

My goal in life is to advance humanity and create civilization.

In a competent human arrangement all have a reasonable voice and all listen to the reasonable view.

The Socially responsible is the individual that presents the reasonable path for life's preservation. 

The producer of the human element and essence is the revolutionary. I am prepared to listen to any dignified, decent, sensitive, kind, caring, and sincerely concerned individual, for they are the living embodiment of nature's evolutionary revolution.

Like to touch on the last clause by the judge. I've written thousands of posts with a pretty fair original, in quality, flair.  I believe it's been frustrating for many wondering where these thoughts originate. Anyone of my so called "mentors" I've conversed with in the past, as in the present, and being aware of their identity, the conversation as I tried to listen intently, stupidly as it turned out as it turned out, maybe involving myself in an hour long or two diatribe was as the judge alluded, my interviewee talking excessively in a very long erratic circle to no apparent conclusion being reasonably drawn.
Those, on the other hand, "listening" where just in attendance just looking for a vulnerability to exploit. I get the original portion, which much of my input humbly entails, pure originality, of my posts, "because they tried that in Russia," China, Cuba, or wherever, was not in the least true, from my own sincere heartfelt sensitivities, my heart.  Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create the Socialist. 

This quote is uncoordinated in that education is synonymous with morals.  What President Roosevelt is referring is technology. Technologist are at this point in the 21st century, as in all of the written past, have typically been the instigators of social imbalance by introducing toys for the kids to make mess. For instance, Henry Ford making the automobile available for millions, folks like the Rockefellers fueling it,  was a total menace for social progress, as our above-mentioned President was probably not too aware because he and his other mentally disorganized supporters, also mentioned were not to psychologically associated with the real world, to busy being menaces.  Technology should be for the progress of humans, and not humans solely for the progress of technology, as presently practiced, sadly for the human. Wake up the robots.

Kings or parents, it is the dispossessed  educated who pursue what is best for the children, for it is they who understand that  children are not possessions, but organisms to be enlightened.

Mr Archer, you're saying, in my interpretation, that the self governor that govern least governs best. To be our best is all out full time investment, and so it figures that the entwined interrelationship of self and community tells us that the government that governs most governs best, as with the self, to leave us at our best.

Education is closer to a continual scrutinization; any claims of being different, scrutinized with extreme cautious but fair examination.  For the hunter still roams as we try to cultivate understanding.