Robert, the religion of the far-right (it being at its core, anti-Christian) has had NO way the influence of the far-left's religion (socialism, woke, immorality, etc.) has had on schools or culture. The latest dummy down is by way of an advancing wokeism / socialism.

I owned a Montessori school and otherwise home schooled my children. My wife was a master educator, she being NOT papered from any dark ecclesiastical seminary (public school) in education. One result of Lewis' comment was my oldest started a major university at age 14. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, with its ecclesiastical seminaries, media, propaganda clerics and otherwise avenues of denigrating peace, truth, love and otherwise nature's law elements (morality, ability to think, individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty) go to prove Lewis' point. 

Sillik, your theocratic word salad starts off correctly by stating: "one person is as good and as valuable as any other" and then your nonsense devolves into dark theology by making an inorganic / abstract concept ("community") a god with its extending ecclesiocracy an arranged assembly. Each and every, any and all are only as good and as valuable as any other when abiding nature's law — there and only there, is individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, equality and fairness realized. Your theocratic attempt at fairness fails miserably by definition, under all other circumstances and, always has. An example at law: is 2 + 2 fair? Is gravity fair? Is rain on fertile ground — compared to drought on infertile ground fair? Is oil and water's inability to blend without a third element that emulsifies, fair? etc. Your theology does not correctly compute the human condition as lawful, scientific or fair.

Sillik, your theoretic dogma here stated is anti law, science and reality. Your "good" here is an inorganic abstract constructed by theocratic bias — mislabeling an effect to a cause. "Good" when measured and defined by nature's law and science is understood by a reoccurring result — by example, extensions of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law are by a person a natural expression (no matter community arrangement or assembly). Your dictionary for mentally ill children is ANTI— nature's law, science and truth.

Sillik, "fair" — by who's standard or interpretation? A socialist favors only the elite of the pack, everyone else shares the scraps (if there be any). Your god complex makes you the unique favorite. There is NO correlating or otherwise corresponding appropriate decision and the wold pack (socialism)/

Sillik, in your personal god complex, you — not being part of the pack (socialized behavior) and you being the only socialist you know of (a lot oxymoronic on your part), please tell us what you have created that surpassed the challenge.

Sillik, your theocratic propaganda once again lacks fact, evidence and truth. Sillik, you once said you wouldn't say something you couldn't prove. Please use a lawful procedure or scientific method to demonstrate a majority vote is anything but a majority vote. Please define truth and how it correlates to an accepted lie that has been given by a dictator. Sillik, in your personal god complex, you — not being part of the pack (socialized behavior) and you being the only socialist you know of (a lot oxymoronic on your part), please tell us what you have created that surpassed the challenge (???); and, how does socialism challenge socialized behavior.

It is the malefactors directing the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land unconstitutionally / ANTI-lawfully that on occasion adhere to a fundamental proposition that serves as a system's behavior or reasoning.

Voting is NOT ! ! ! a right (by definition) but rather, a sacred duty, an imperative responsibility and an incumbent function of a sentient being in an organized status of individuals.

The de jure States united is lawfully NOT a democracy anything ! ! !  Nature's law - cause and effect, derives from truth and ends in truth (the truth will make you free). Technical requirements dictate that one person / one vote have to be held sacrosanct.

There are four (4) Terms that are misused, confused and otherwise incorrectly abused - by an extremely terse term explanation.

DEMOCRACY:

Democracy is: “That form of government in which the sovereign power is exercised by the people in a body,” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Democracy can not perceive or identify a single person or individual (inclusive of the rights, liberty or law thereof) - its domain or realm is solely limited to recognizing an inorganic whole’s ostensively supposed will. By democracy’s definition and practice, there is no individual sovereignty, personal rights, liberty, nature’s law or anything outside a mobs will. Attributed to Benjamin Franklin is a quote that describes democracy well: “Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.”

DEMOCRATIC PROCESS:

Democratic process describes a procedurally measured system that maintains “A series of actions, motions, or occurrences; a method, mode, or operation, whereby a result or effect to produced.” (West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, ed. 2.) A “democratic process” may be useful in a democracy, a republic or a republican form government (it is NOT exclusive to democracy). A “democratic process” also simply indicates, one (1) man, one (1) vote (no reference to outcome, form of government {democracy, monarchy, republican, de facto, de jure, etc.}) or, choice between liberty or slavery.

REPUBLIC:

A Republic is primarily separated into ostensibly differing references. By example:
1) A “republic” is “A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens.”
2) “In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)
A democracy perceives a/the “body” - people or otherwise are an inconsequential annoyance only required for voting; while, a republic administers the affairs of each citizen.
3) A republic can also be the term that describes the specific boarder (boundaries) of a particular jurisdiction, not denoting any system of body politic application.

REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT:

A republican form of government is an egalitarian based system where individual sentient sovereigns exercise personal inalienable rights and liberty at “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence). A resulting consortium, as a body politic (hired, elected or otherwise) has no rights but duties only AND, does (do) NOT represent any individual (personally or in concert) but rather, is to administer a limited “legislative”, “executive” and “judicial” charge of inalienable rights and liberty at the laws of nature and of nature’s God.

As to the Ballot and Bullets. "Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." (attributed to Benjamin Franklin)

In a representative republic based on nature's law, individuals do NOT ! ! ! vote on their interests BUT RATHER, on what laws (that already exist in nature) to administer and how those laws are to be managed. Interests (by example living off of other's labors and money) that are self aggrandized — such as socialism, are contrary to law and the best interest of humanity. 

Sillik, 🤣 hahaha, 🤪 lolololol Your here circular word salad does indicate that you are a socialist because of your need to change the meaning of words / concepts / etc.; AND, your declaration of divine status does expose your mentally ill status. Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man. Maybe, just to illuminate you theocratic dogma, please describe what socialism has created in your mind that didn't come about by other means.

Sillik, spoken like a good socialist. Your redefinition of words (such as gods and devils) betray you. Your gods (by example; Marx, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, etc.) have created the theocratic dogmas and propaganda that you parret; AND, your devils are all those that don't support your mental illness. I believe that each and every individual is equal before the law. Can you please define your equality through scientific methods / processes? Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Sillik, 🤣 hahaha, 🤪 lolololol WHAT? By your own self proclamation, you can NOT reason, understand your own biased decisions and, your biased conclusions are grossly immature. Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Sillik, please be definitive through scientific method / measures in describing "the life process".

Sillik, one of your primary gods (along with all other of your gods and high priests) have sought to advance socialism through strength, force and violence which makes socialism an anti-humanitarian religion. Which of your gods will choose the boundaries so that a medium may be determined? Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Sillik, your theocratic nonsense is empty dribble. You state there is no god outside your religion's carnal gods. The Deity I worship is available to all — even socialists. Sillik, which of your gods is correctly able to allocate another god's resource designations? Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Sillik, your theocratic delusion, as set forth in your incoherent word salads are an exercise in the mentally ill's mind. You know, it is the police, lawyers and courts that enslave through evenly distributing your ex nihilo mental processing attributes.  Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Sillik, being the self confessed god that you are, please enlighten us as to your perspective concerning the human purpose, what is the premiere life promoting / preserving process, the life's fuel that promotes purpose and who would be your sub-god that administers correlated needs. Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Sillik, since you speak with yourself and other socialists, you have spoken with wolves. Your admitted ignorance on the subject helps your incoherent word salad on the matter. Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.

Socialism challenges individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism, through its many denominations, creates censorship, illogical dialogue, pain, suffering, poverty, anger, violence, death, war and all else that is contrary to the nobility of man.