“He who, when he may, forbids not sin, commands it.”

I really like the concept of opposites. Depending on "sin's" definition, the abstraction or the impression carries a very broad application. Sin, in and of itself, may be as narrow as a religious canon infraction; or, sin may be a most broadly interpretive comprehension of law breaking in general. Within a setting of nature's law, sin would include such unlawful activities as compelled compliance, government licensing, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money / debt notes, governmental wealth seizures, socialism, etc.), socialism and non-recognition / enforcement of inalienable rights and inate freedom / liberty

Interesting.  I suppose it means that if we do not care to recognize a line between 'right and wrong', we will inevitably cross it.

We should strive to perform appropriately, because nature insists on it.