Archer, thank you — said very well ! ! !

🤪 ABSOLUTELY !  — but, I'm sure the state of Utah will not give up it godly status in claiming a perfected allodium on all property (including each sentient being).

ABSOLUTELY ! ! ! We hold this truth to be self evident.

The legislative, executive, judicial along with their 4th branch, the media — of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land only sees rabbits to be preyed upon. Compelled compliance, government license, victimless crimes, systemic larceny (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, SS, police state confiscations, etc.), and NON-recognition of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, perfected allodium at nature's law, etc., etc., etc. are all designed against prey by predators.

Sillik, your childish attempts to subjectively redefine words from the adult and history’s real and legal world only goes to prove your god syndrome’s fallacy. By objective example: Religion is: “real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯ our fellow men.” (Bouviers Law Dictionary). “⋯ Socialism is a religion. All we lack is a religious genius capable of uprooting outmoded religious practices and putting new ones in their place. We lack traditions and ritual. One day soon National Socialism will be the religion of all Germans. My Party is my church, and I believe I serve the Lord best if I do his will, and liberate my oppressed people from the fetters of slavery. That is my gospel.” (Joseph Goebbels, Diary entry, October 16, 1928) Communism is categorized as a left of center application of socialism’s many forms of enslavement (your social and otherwise duty to your fellow man).

Archer, said extremely well. I might add that, government (an inorganic / non-sensorial abstract) is most accurately an extension of law and justice, simply administrated by those willing to be servants thereto. A government of / by / for people is either a gathering of sovereign servants serving the law / justice; OR, as interpreted the vast majority of the time, a socialistic usurpation of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. 

Sillik, it goes to show your mental disorder and childishness when - I have corrected you, placed real adult definitions to you fallacious / erroneous dictionary for mentally ill children, illuminated your lies and shed light on such personal flaws as your god syndrome and religion — you falsely interpret such a a f-you or other insult. It is abundantly clear why, when Archer or I speak (write) truth to your ANTI — law / science and enigmatic word salads, you find it non-inspirational. 😁 Have a nice day.

thanks

Bastiat's here focus is on the many faceted administrations of the law, as well as man made rules and canons, NOT the law itself specifically.

Sillik, "create"? Create what ? ? ? — the answer; communism creates enslavement, mental, moral and physical degradation, poverty, pain and the loss of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Proven through out history — over, and over and over again.

Sillik, communism is a cataclysmic religion that draws despots to enslave chattel that have NO idea what it means to be human.

(-; I guess that is one reason. ;-) Communism (any all forms of socialism) doesn't / don't work for a lot of reasons. As faculties of birth, individuals come into this life as individual sovereigns, with inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law (to start a list). All such is antithetical to communism (socialism).

Sillik, you are wrong again. Socialism is based on religious dogma (contrary to reason, truth, material fact, science and law). History has shown over and over and over again that the most universal destructive course of action has always been the choice of a socialist advisor.

Sillik, hahaha / lolololol; wrong again. Neither you nor I are superior / inferior one to another — sometimes, just more accurate.

Sillik, hahaha / lolololol; no one ask you if you objected or otherwise to anything. I didn't attept to convey Mr. Archer's feelings. I simply entered your public dialogue to interject a bit of accuracy contrary to what you had stated. You regularly object to truth so your off topic / misdirection word salad here is an exercise in the norm.

Sillik 🤣🤣🤣, lolololol — hahahaha; what? ? ? Except for the reality of your imbecilic word salad, it is really hard to believe that an air breathing creature could make such a statement. You had to dig deep into your personal dictionary for mentally ill children to come up with those fallacious meanings.

By definition, "atheism" in and of itself is not a religion. When atheism is acted upon by ethical or moral reasoning or principled formulations it becomes a religion. Christianity, in and of itself is not a religion. It is when the teachings of the historical Jesus are interacted with or implemented by ethical or moral means does Christianity become a religion.

Sillik, acting in your god syndrome, spouting religious dogma antithetical to science is a good argument for authenticating your mental disorder. 😁

Sillik, I don't think Archer would mind if I jumped in here to point out your religious dogmas ridiculous statement. What does, "equal distribution of resources" mean? ? ? Who is your god that will measure and make such distribution? Does each person get his / her own tree in the forest? How will your god divide up the many minerals in their varying forms? AND, FYI, fascism and communism merely differ by the means of their socialistic methodology of distribution.

Sillik, your incoherent word salad threads an almost accurate thought through an otherwise dismal ignorance and goofy argument against a subject that was never raised. Your swinging at windmills is indicative of a socialist's need to create definitions that were never part of the equation.

A slave is: “A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another.” (Webster; Anderson v. Salant, 38 R.I. 463, 96 A. 425, 428, L.R.A.1916D, 651. O - Black’s Law Dictionary); and, “A man who is by law deprived of his liberty for life, and becomes the property of another.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)

The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land is absolutely antithetical to ancient / original common law, is in fact, repugnant to principles of nature’s / natural law and has evolved to claim a falsely interpreted foundation. Said theocracy does not recognize or allow a perfected allodium (absolute ownership - only a property's title {privilege} at best). Under the socialistic second plank of the communist manifesto (SS, banking, etc.) the carnal god(s), with their priesthood (government) owns each individual person (sensorial, legal, political, etc.), their commercial exploits (wages, profits, etc.) and otherwise defined actions. Through compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, endemic larceny (funny money, etc.) and NON recognition of nature’s laws (individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, etc.) - that “natural law” that ethically and morally patterns nature’s law, the once noble free are enslaved by degree.

Out side ancient Hebrew definitions of justice, have I ever seen an absolute, definitive or legal definition of "right". At nature's law, a right is an essential and inalienable component, making up or organizing the most primitive of raw elements. Through corporeal man's legal philosophies, a right can not be definitively described as that would limit carnal man's god syndrome authority.

I here use the phrase; "We The People", not as Lincoln did (a socialist's / collectivist's source of law and jurisdiction) but rather, individual sovereigns united (also, united vs. union {a collectivist whole})

One star as averse to a thumbs down because with the smallest of a single thread, Hoover here attempts to weave an almost accuracy into "freedom's" entire tapestry. Freedom and liberty are inalienable elements of the noble being man, whether or not, man's inhumanity to man allows the manifestation of such.

Sillik, your pridefully ignorant word salad can only be made from applying definitions from your god syndrome's dictionary for mentally ill children; AND, not reading history. By example: within nature's law (Declaration of Independence), each individual is equally "united" under said law. The King's form of the "man's philosophy" — "legal positivism" didn't / couldn't unite because of its class perceptions and warfare (much like socialism).

Dick, I guess it is all in how you define the term "god". A legal definition of religion is: Religion is: “ real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯,our fellow men.” (Bouviers Law Dictionary) Your "god", by lengthy recitals on this blog is government. Are you saying that your depiction of god and religion are not realistic?

Originally, this nation was to be a jurisdiction of nature's laws (Declaration of Independence). The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land mandates enslavement according to government (gods) ecclesiastical dogmas (does not recognize or allow such "law"). Religions that may compete for doctrinal life styles foreign to the occupying statist theocracy are not allowed. Law is a body of absolutes (science, math, etc.) and applies equally to all individuals. Religion is an observation of ethics, morals and other abstracts that may or may not be in compliance to / with nature's law. There is minimized freedom of religion when other than pure justice is used as the standard (pure justice is ONLY applicable to nature's law).