The focused key word here is “unlimited”. What is unlimited tolerance? That can’t be good 😁. If “tolerance” means: “The capacity for, or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others.” (American Heritage Dictionary) Then “Intolerance”, would then be the opposite of that - I say hmmm. Again, can’t be good. “In the United States, there is no such a thing as toleration, all men have an equal right ⋯” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)

Another, for example; WE are NOT ! ! ! the government. The government is a recognized body of existing laws with certain individuals hired to administer rules of order. Corporeal man can NOT make law. A government of the people, by the people and for the people is a government of "people" NOT, a government of "law". That which separated man's philosophies (legal positivism, legal realism, etc.) mingled with religion (Tyranny, usurpation, slavery, etc.) from individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law (the law of nature and of nature's God {Declaration of Independence} first paragraph) was a creation of land of free individuals and brave persons.

🤪 in the scope of the current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, along with its extremely corrupt Executive, Legislative and Judiciary thereof — ABSOLUTELY ! ! !  Try going against one of the theocracy's canons or ideological dogmas— The Executive may execute you; the Legislative will be so offended (beware); AND, the Judiciary's Priests / High Priests (the Sadducees and Pharisees) / Judges & Attorneys can / will bury you.

I like it a lot ! ! !  With, a giant "BUT", that is,  — assuming there is a conflict (real, made up or otherwise) and the one Party actually wants peace. Communists of the left and, fascists of the right (the scale of socialism), mingled with religious fervor advance compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, police state confiscations, etc.) and a dissolution of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law — so that conflict and hostility are easily created / inflated.

Yes; while in a broader sense, off the top of my head, I can't think of a time freedom was brought about by revolution. A fight to throw off oppressors is far different than fighting for freedom. After all, how many under the influence of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land can accurately describe individual sovereignty, inalienable rights or freedom and liberty at the laws of nature and of nature's God, let alone how to administer such? If freedom is unknown to the revolutionaries, how will the revolution bring about freedom?

Okay, pin-pricks come in many shades and colors. Anything that is an assault on the being (minute to life threatening) may be interpreted as a pin-prick. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, with it compelled compliance, government licensing, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, police state confiscations, etc.), non-recognition of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law are all pin-pricks. Socialism's degrees of ant farm utopia enactments gradations of slavery. When and what pin-pricks are greater than a being can stand (individually and / or in concert)?

Archer, well said

Denise, I know you mean well but the phrase "of the people, by the people and for the people" was said by Pres. Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address (it is not in the Constitution). It was Lincoln's subtle way of moving the mind set of free individual sovereigns, independent - with inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law to a union of controlable helots and serfs under advancing forms of socialism (couched in a philosophy of legal positivism)

YES ! ! ! The Declaration of Independence was a Notice to the world that the independent / individual free sovereigns abiding within the boundaries of the States united chose to no longer live under philosophies of men tyranny (legal positivism, legal realism, etc. — mingled with a religious Divine right of kings) but rather, to exist and thrive with the "laws of nature and of nature's God".

Compelled compliance, government licensing, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, police state confiscations, etc.), and lack of recognition of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law violate this principle and common law realization.

Sillik, your undefined "path of function" is a religious dogma that will not work (in science, at nature's law or reality). Under the current system (flawed and illegal as it is) 100% employment is allowed. There are many reasons why people are unemployed. The national debt can NOT be paid off ! ! ! The current monetary system is one of perpetual debt. Each dollar in circulation was borrowed with interest. The interest payments must be borrowed also. A never ending story of debt. "A way of paying less and acquiring more life." is a religious non-related nonsense that is beyond oxymoronic.

Robert, good to see you again.

Sillik, I shake my lowered head. Of course you have no understanding of individual sovereignty; if you did, you could not have written the rest of your circular word salad.

Sillik, hahaha / lololol — is that Mr., Mrs., or Mz science that says that to you? Did that same science say the opposite is as accurate as your circular word salad? By example: the more the religion of socialism uses deadly force and religious rhetoric it grows (anti-life & does not facilitate life).

What / which "logic" is that which naturally tells us? I say hmmm. It, they, etc. may be whispering in your ear BUT, that formal guiding dogma of your religious discipline; OR, your mode of religious reasoning is no logic; it does NOT speak to sane and mature adults, as they would / could not recognize such.

Your circular word salad, filtered through your religious propaganda is not science, logic or within nature's law.

Sillik, your religious interpretation, expressed through a circular word salad is non-sensical and misdirection frivolous at best. Your "antisocial arrangement", being equivalent to an ant farm utopia, anti-science / nature's law, thieving, murdering, raping, etc. by an arranged social (socialist) means, is a religious propagandist's lie as in concerns me. Reality is your enemy, not me.

Sillik you are absolutely wrong. In your case, as evidenced by previous posts, education equals indoctrination of religious dogma. Individual sovereignty, inalienable rights as well as freedom and liberty at nature's law are faculties of birth — innate with the noble being / ab initio through fruition. Further, your understanding through responsible behavior runs through a religious filter that assures confinement.

Liberty is; “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons. Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, nature’s law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: liberty is; “The condition of being free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor.” (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition.) “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the Will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule.” (John Locke - second most quoted source for creation of the Constitution) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987). Liberty, under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) – nature’s law, is the state of exercising all inalienable rights. “All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” (George Mason) “Liberty exists in proportion to wholesome restraint; the more restraint on others to keep off from us, the more liberty we have.” (Daniel Webster) “So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.” (James 2:12) For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” (Galatians 5:16) “Where liberty is, there is my country” (Benjamin Franklin).

FREEDOM is: “The state of being free; liberty; self determination:” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st Edition); freedom is: “the power or liberty to order one's own actions” (Colins English Dictionary); freedom is: “The ability to act at liberty.” (Webster’s Dictionary) “All men by nature are equal in that equal right that every man hath to his natural freedom, without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man; being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.” (John Locke) “Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere.” (Franklin D. Roosevelt) “Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” (Immanuel Kant) Freedom is an endowed expression from an inherent creation; NOT ! an abstract ethos based / outside-in to-be-controlled anomaly.

Sillik, your religion's systemic double speak can't have it both ways.

Sillik, I am mostly in accord with what you have here written. Using your own definitions, being credited with title of human being / individual sovereign with inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law is a polar opposite with / antithetical to the ant farm utopia of socialism.

Sillik, though your religious dogma won't admit the falseness of its reality, it can neither touch or rely on a foundation of nature's law or science for its support. Your religion's dogma must float in an empty ethos of circular word salad.

Sillik, socialism is ANTI — independence, fairness, justice, responsibility, love, beauty, and the very essence of life. Only a mentally ill child can accept your religion's dogmas.

Sillik, your theology has, since inception, been anti-liberty and freedom (anti-law / science) and pro-enslavement. You define a religious cause and effect of pain, suffering, impoverishment and all degradations of slavery "responsible behavior that takes a vital priority." Your religion of miss/re-definitions and ecclesiastical order, touted as "the wise correct choice", is a radical misdirection outside liberty and freedom's — in truth and fact, base/ultimate meanings.

Sillik; 🤪 hahaha / lololol — your kids speak is b*llsh*t 🤣

Sillik, to both your replies to my here posted statements: your religious banter is less comprehensive and anti-reality / science / math / etc. than most of your circular word salads.

To the quote: Amen, Amen, & AMEN ! ! !

The land of the free and home of the brave is still embodied in the Declaration of Independence; though ! ! !, the Amerika of today is a lawless tyranny (anti-"laws of nature and of nature's God"). The occupying statist theocracy infesting this nation has, in most part, erased from the hearts and minds of corporeal man, the being's innate recognition of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law.