(-; I guess that is one reason. ;-) Communism (any all forms of socialism) doesn't / don't work for a lot of reasons. As faculties of birth, individuals come into this life as individual sovereigns, with inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law (to start a list). All such is antithetical to communism (socialism).

Sillik, you are wrong again. Socialism is based on religious dogma (contrary to reason, truth, material fact, science and law). History has shown over and over and over again that the most universal destructive course of action has always been the choice of a socialist advisor.

Sillik, hahaha / lolololol; wrong again. Neither you nor I are superior / inferior one to another — sometimes, just more accurate.

Sillik, hahaha / lolololol; no one ask you if you objected or otherwise to anything. I didn't attept to convey Mr. Archer's feelings. I simply entered your public dialogue to interject a bit of accuracy contrary to what you had stated. You regularly object to truth so your off topic / misdirection word salad here is an exercise in the norm.

Sillik 🤣🤣🤣, lolololol — hahahaha; what? ? ? Except for the reality of your imbecilic word salad, it is really hard to believe that an air breathing creature could make such a statement. You had to dig deep into your personal dictionary for mentally ill children to come up with those fallacious meanings.

By definition, "atheism" in and of itself is not a religion. When atheism is acted upon by ethical or moral reasoning or principled formulations it becomes a religion. Christianity, in and of itself is not a religion. It is when the teachings of the historical Jesus are interacted with or implemented by ethical or moral means does Christianity become a religion.

Sillik, acting in your god syndrome, spouting religious dogma antithetical to science is a good argument for authenticating your mental disorder. 😁

Sillik, I don't think Archer would mind if I jumped in here to point out your religious dogmas ridiculous statement. What does, "equal distribution of resources" mean? ? ? Who is your god that will measure and make such distribution? Does each person get his / her own tree in the forest? How will your god divide up the many minerals in their varying forms? AND, FYI, fascism and communism merely differ by the means of their socialistic methodology of distribution.

Sillik, your incoherent word salad threads an almost accurate thought through an otherwise dismal ignorance and goofy argument against a subject that was never raised. Your swinging at windmills is indicative of a socialist's need to create definitions that were never part of the equation.

A slave is: “A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another.” (Webster; Anderson v. Salant, 38 R.I. 463, 96 A. 425, 428, L.R.A.1916D, 651. O - Black’s Law Dictionary); and, “A man who is by law deprived of his liberty for life, and becomes the property of another.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)

The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land is absolutely antithetical to ancient / original common law, is in fact, repugnant to principles of nature’s / natural law and has evolved to claim a falsely interpreted foundation. Said theocracy does not recognize or allow a perfected allodium (absolute ownership - only a property's title {privilege} at best). Under the socialistic second plank of the communist manifesto (SS, banking, etc.) the carnal god(s), with their priesthood (government) owns each individual person (sensorial, legal, political, etc.), their commercial exploits (wages, profits, etc.) and otherwise defined actions. Through compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, endemic larceny (funny money, etc.) and NON recognition of nature’s laws (individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, etc.) - that “natural law” that ethically and morally patterns nature’s law, the once noble free are enslaved by degree.

Out side ancient Hebrew definitions of justice, have I ever seen an absolute, definitive or legal definition of "right". At nature's law, a right is an essential and inalienable component, making up or organizing the most primitive of raw elements. Through corporeal man's legal philosophies, a right can not be definitively described as that would limit carnal man's god syndrome authority.

I here use the phrase; "We The People", not as Lincoln did (a socialist's / collectivist's source of law and jurisdiction) but rather, individual sovereigns united (also, united vs. union {a collectivist whole})

One star as averse to a thumbs down because with the smallest of a single thread, Hoover here attempts to weave an almost accuracy into "freedom's" entire tapestry. Freedom and liberty are inalienable elements of the noble being man, whether or not, man's inhumanity to man allows the manifestation of such.

Sillik, your pridefully ignorant word salad can only be made from applying definitions from your god syndrome's dictionary for mentally ill children; AND, not reading history. By example: within nature's law (Declaration of Independence), each individual is equally "united" under said law. The King's form of the "man's philosophy" — "legal positivism" didn't / couldn't unite because of its class perceptions and warfare (much like socialism).

Dick, I guess it is all in how you define the term "god". A legal definition of religion is: Religion is: “ real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯,our fellow men.” (Bouviers Law Dictionary) Your "god", by lengthy recitals on this blog is government. Are you saying that your depiction of god and religion are not realistic?

Originally, this nation was to be a jurisdiction of nature's laws (Declaration of Independence). The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land mandates enslavement according to government (gods) ecclesiastical dogmas (does not recognize or allow such "law"). Religions that may compete for doctrinal life styles foreign to the occupying statist theocracy are not allowed. Law is a body of absolutes (science, math, etc.) and applies equally to all individuals. Religion is an observation of ethics, morals and other abstracts that may or may not be in compliance to / with nature's law. There is minimized freedom of religion when other than pure justice is used as the standard (pure justice is ONLY applicable to nature's law).

By way of an extremely terse / non-exhaustive list of examples: DEI, sexual deviancies, and Stockholm Syndrome techniques (promoting government as god / inclusive of socialism) are all practiced / implemented pre-school on.

Sillik, this is normally where I shake my lowered head in disbelief; BUT, your lying word salad here is abnormally false (even for you — beyond simple stupid and ignorance). Your plain display observance is twisted beyond recognition. Those that declared their independence chose an existence harmonious to nature's law which would assure individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, peace, prosperity, love and truth. Such is diametrically opposed to the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's implementation of enslaving socialism, funny money / debt, and all else that is contrary to the nobility that is the child (children) of Eternity's King.

🤪🤪🤪 Sillik, I laugh, - more imbecilic word salad. Defined from no other source than a carnal god's syndrome with a related dictionary for mentally ill children. 

"The law of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) / individual sovereignty / inalienable rights / liberty are all lost precepts to the vast majority of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's helots, serfs and slaves.

The Author of Christianity said: “But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;” (Matthew 5:44). Said principle is absolutely antithetical to the religion of socialism. Socialism is a religion that promotes terrorism, disorderly conduct, disturbing the peace, non-freedom of expression while subverting other American ideals.

Sillik, Following the admonition of one of your god's (a lie told often enough becomes the truth) does not make your word salad any more credible. You continually call science religion and religion science — you don't seem to understand the difference between the two. By example: socialism is a religion while, maximum wage now is a dogma of that religion and you have been incapable of using any scientific methodology to say otherwise. Simply stating the same lie over and over again does not make it so. Who made a god out of Gautamal? No one I'm aware of; oops, you are wrong again.

Sillik, your ignorance and prejudice on religion here is expansive. I've given you legal, sectarian and scientific definitions of religion but, I guess it doesn't match your personal dictionary for mentally ill children. By example, there are religions that do not include supernatural doctrines (Buddhism {teachings of Siddhartha Gautama}, Humanism, Socialism, etc.). Your personal god syndrome's empty word salad: "Maximum wage now", is only a religion's worthless dogma.

Robert, you obviously do not understand the full or whole meaning of Religion. I've given the meaning of religion multiple times on this blog and can do so again if you so choose. The current occupying church promotes a religion based on illegitimate philosophies of men (legal positivism, legal realism, maritime jurisdictions on land, socialism, immorality, etc.) vs. "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) which define, support and promote individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty.

Not shooting the messenger, ABSOLUTELY ! ! ! The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land would have no competing doctrine / dogma demonstrate an alternative life style, inalienable rights or liberty at nature's law.

As to proof of the statement, one only needs look at the current situation. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has convinced the enslaved chattel that the carnal gods' (government's) compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses and larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, etc.) is/are (is individually; are, to the socialist masses) in fact the chattel's inalienable right at liberty.

An acute in the obvious observation. The negative comments here seem to be adherents of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's ecclesiastical dogmas.